Lawyers are not immune from being targeted by criminals who seek to exploit some of the work practices used by the legal profession. New Zealand lawyers are often sent emails by fraudsters, almost always based outside the country. This Practice Briefing provides information on the most commonly-encountered scams in New Zealand and suggests some tests for detecting them.
The following indicators are common features of email scams. The problem is that while an email which contains some or all of these is probably fraudulent, it could also be genuine.
The following elements are common if an email scam is allowed to progress:
Often the would-be thief provides identification documents. The scammers have a pool of stolen and forged documents and identities which they use to “prove” their bona fides. Scams use the names and addresses of real individuals who are not involved in any way. They also use the name and websites of genuine companies. Other scams use false websites which have been copied from genuine websites in other countries.
Breach of lease: Seeks assistance for a breach of lease of equipment “but they have since fallen short of the executed agreement”.
Business loan: Seeks assistance in recovering unpaid portion of a loan made to a business or person “living in your jurisdiction”.
Collaborative loan agreement: Seeks assistance in recovering a matrimonial settlement which is documented by a collaborative law agreement.
Husband acting strangely: Seeks assistance in enforcing an agreement to pay alimony.
Legal representation: Seeking a lawyer to represent a company (often Chinese) doing business in North America.
Litigation of a loan: Wants legal assistance in possible litigation over a loan.
Loan agreement and promissory note: Seeks assistance in chasing repayment of a well-documented loan.
New Zealand house purchase: Seeks assistance with purchase and payment for a house in New Zealand.
Because many scams involve the production of false or stolen identification, scammers tend to use the same name many times. Some scams use the names of famous people (Rupert Murdoch and Paul McCartney have both been used in New Zealand) in a bid to counter any Google search seeking to find examples of a fraud related to that name.
The table lists some of the names which have been used by scammers in emails to New Zealand lawyers. Note that most of these names may belong to a completely innocent individual whose identity is being used by the scammers. Scammers also change names frequently.
Name |
Scam associated with |
Abel Jones |
New Zealand house purchase |
Adams Cavendish |
New Zealand house purchase |
Alfred Odwod |
Litigation of a loan |
Alice Wood |
Legal representation |
Allen Hoshiko |
Divorce settlement |
Andre Kitaya |
Divorce settlement |
Anthony J Earl |
New Zealand house purchase |
Anthony Johnson |
Litigation of a loan |
Brenda Blumenkrantz |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
Brett Abraham |
Litigation of a loan |
Brian Smith |
Litigation of a loan |
Christina Freitag |
Litigation of a loan |
Crystal Masaru |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
Daichi Nakamura |
Litigation of a loan |
David Yap Chung |
Legal representation |
Donna Lynn Chipman |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
EDL Legal |
False identity fraud |
Elizabeth Yamashita |
Loan agreement and promissory note |
Emmanuel Wilson |
New Zealand house purchase |
Eric Muller |
Litigation of a loan |
Gerald Hines |
New Zealand house purchase |
Hachirou Hasfa |
“Contempt petition” |
Hak Wah Lau |
Legal representation |
Hans Hubert Lienhard |
Litigation of loan agreement |
Harmony Young |
Child support payments |
Henriet M Kazuo |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
Isabella Minoru |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
Itsuki Hiroyuk |
Merger assistance required |
James Campbell |
Breach of loan agreement |
James Cole |
New Zealand house purchase |
James Gilliard |
Breach of loan agreement |
Joe van Hae |
Litigation of a loan |
John Becker |
New Zealand house purchase |
Joseph Gasper |
New Zealand house purchase |
Kathryn Wordeman (genuine non-scammer) |
Breach of loan agreement |
Kato Sasaki |
Merger assistance required |
Kazuo Miyoko |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
Kenneth Dean |
Litigation of a loan |
Kiyoshi Yukio |
Breach of lease |
Kodansha Ltd |
Merger assistance required |
Larry Leroy |
Litigation of a loan |
Linda Kirk |
Litigation of a loan |
Luis Davis |
False identity fraud |
Lynda W Cheng |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
Marina Kitaya |
Divorce settlement |
Marybeth Fordam |
Loan agreement and promissory note |
Matsui Tatsuyuki |
Litigation of a loan |
Maxwell Logan |
Legal representation |
Michel Susan Patrick |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
Mid River Steel |
Breach of contract |
Mike Garry |
New Zealand house purchase |
Mona Kismat |
Investment assistance sought |
Nan Yhang |
Breach of lease |
Nguyen Minh-Tam |
Breach of contract |
Nissha Printing Co Ltd |
Merger assistance |
NPI Lease Company Ltd |
Breach of lease |
Omega loan |
Litigation of a loan |
Pamela Wong |
Breach of lease |
Peters Anderson |
New Zealand house purchase |
Rich Robertson |
Litigation of a loan |
Robert Otermat |
Litigation of a loan |
Robinsons Solicitors (genuine non-scammer) |
Mistaken identity fraud |
Rupert Murdoch |
Business loan |
Sain Young |
“Contempt petition” |
Samuel Bendikson |
Litigation of a loan |
Sanitra Mary Jacob |
Loan agreement and promissory note |
Sara Mary Berkley (Ms) |
Husband acting strangely |
Sara Mary Chandis (Mrs) |
Husband acting strangely |
Sheila Shquingzhou |
New Zealand house purchase |
Silva Lawson |
Litigation of a loan |
Sin Lain Glass Industries |
Investment assistance sought |
Stafford S Mark |
Loan agreement and promissory note |
Steve Maughan |
New Zealand house purchase |
Strong Mark |
New Zealand house purchase |
Terry Cole |
New Zealand house purchase |
Tim Clark (genuine non-scammer) |
Mistaken identity fraud |
Zaira Hoshiko |
Collaborative Law Agreement |
If you receive an email from someone who is unknown to you and which asks you to provide legal services, you should treat it with some caution, particularly if it comes from outside New Zealand. Unless you are totally certain that it is genuine, it is recommended that you do not respond.
The New Zealand Police have advised the Law Society that a lawyer who actually loses money in an email scam should report it to the Police. This should be done by giving a statement and other information to the nearest Police station, rather than to the Financial Intelligence Unit or the Financial Crime Group.
If you are the recipient of an email which attempts to defraud you, the Police recommend providing information to the Department of Internal Affairs (forward the email to scam@reportspam.co.nz) or to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs (www.theorb.org.nz/forms/scam-or-fraud/ and follow the instructions).
Rule 4.1 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules (refusing instructions) lists when a lawyer has good cause to refuse instructions. When faced with a potential scam, a lawyer may wish to inquire first about the basis of the introduction – given that the approach will have been unsolicited.
Lawyers need to adopt a balancing act between being available to act, with a healthy amount of scepticism, to avoid becoming a victim of an email scam.
If you think a matter might be a scam, check out the my.lawsociety or other scam-listing websites, or contact the Law Society. If the scam is confirmed, decline to act. If a scam turns out to be a genuine instruction and ends up being a complaint, a lawyers standards committee would be more inclined to view the matter in your favour if you have taken some identifiable steps to support your suspicion.
If you wish to stop communications after a scam is detected and there has been an exchange of emails and supply of a letter of engagement, the following wording is suggested.
“Dear recipient
“We have made further inquiries and it appears that you are not the person who you say you are and your request for legal services is not bona fide. We understand that you have been impersonating [name used by scammer] and that you have used her/his name to try and defraud members of the legal profession and possibly others.
“We no longer represent you and the engagement letter we have provided is withdrawn.
“We have reported your activities to New Zealand organisations which maintain details of activities such as those carried out by yourself.”