On 23 November 2022, Dame Karen Poutasi’s report on the ‘Joint Review into the Children’s Sector: Identification and response to suspect abuse’ was released. The Joint Review was commissioned by the Chief Executives of six government departments that had contact with Malachi Subecz and his family. Malachi was five years old when he was murdered by the person his mother trusted to care for him while she was incarcerated.
The Joint Review sought to identify whether more could have been done to prevent the harm experienced by Malachi. The Department of Corrections (Corrections) Office of the Inspectorate also undertook a review of the management of Malachi’s mother. It made 12 recommendations, which were accepted by Corrections. These recommendations included review of the process for induction into prison, and the process for raising a report of concern about a child.
Following the Joint Review, the judiciary established a working group with members of the profession and relevant government agencies. The working group identified points throughout the court process where judges should be made aware that a defendant is a sole caregiver, advised of the potential impact of a restrictive sentence on the defendant and their whānau, and informed of arrangements that have been made. This work has been driven by concerns about the impact of parental incarceration on children, including the risk associated with incarceration of a sole caregiver and the impact on the bond between children and their primary caregiver(s).
The following information brings together key points from the revised Corrections’ policies and the work of the judiciary, to assist counsel working with primary caregivers potentially facing restrictive sentences.
Counsel can expect judges to ask questions about parental responsibilities at an early stage, including at the time of bail and when setting bail conditions. The Duty Solicitor form has been amended to prompt and record this information.
All counsel should consider making inquiries of their client, to understand whether they are the sole or primary caregiver of a dependent child or vulnerable adult and to obtain information around factors such as:
Instructions should be sought from the client, at any early stage, if it is identified that information should be brought to the attention of the court.
The Department of Corrections has shared a copy of its practice guidance, ‘Working with Caregivers of Dependent Children or Vulnerable Adults at the PAC Stage’ . This guidance sets out what is required of Corrections staff at the Provision of Advice to Courts (PAC) stage.
The PAC must record information about the client’s caregiver responsibilities, and include a summary of how the dependent child or vulnerable adult may be impacted by possible sentence outcomes, as well as what support or alternative care arrangements have been made.
If a child protection concern is identified during the PAC process, Corrections’ Practice Guidance requires that a report of concern is made to Oranga Tamariki.
If your client is the sole caregiver of a dependent child or has ‘significant child care responsibilities’, and receives a custodial or home detention sentence, the Practice Guidance requires that Corrections must make a Report of Concern to Oranga Tamariki.
When a client is taken into custody and arrives at the prison receiving office, they will be asked about any immediate childcare needs or other support required.
If a client discloses at this stage that they have caregiver responsibilities, a case manager will later meet with them to obtain more information about their circumstances.
Read the Practice Guidace - Working with Caregivers of Dependent Children or Vulnerable Adults at the PAC Stage
There is a growing body of case law recognising the negative impact of parental incarceration on children and young people, and supporting the courts’ consideration of this as a factor relevant to the type and length of sentence that an offender receives. More recently, the Supreme Court has cited with approval, the Court of Appeal’s statement in Campbell v R that:
‘It is uncontroversial that the effect imprisoning an offender’s children has on those children is a factor that may be taken into account in considering the appellant’s personal circumstances.’1
In October 2023, Her Honour Justice Susan Thomas, Fiona Guy Kidd KC and Stacey Shorthall presented a webinar on the ‘Impact of Parental Incarceration on Children”. The webinar aims to increase practitioners’ awareness of the impacts on children of the incarceration of their caregivers, whether at bail or sentencing.
“We know that when Judges are provided with information about and are able to carefully consider the impact of imprisonment on dependent children, there may be a significant impact on bail and sentencing decisions. But all too often Judges do not have the relevant information.”
A recording of the webinar is available online and free of charge.